Category Archives: Credit Crisis

We’ll Make Them An Offer They Can’t Refuse

One person with knowledge of the meetings called it a “take it or take it offer”:

The chief executives of the nine largest banks in the United States trooped into a gilded conference room at the Treasury Department at 3 p.m. Monday. To their astonishment, they were each handed a one-page document that said they agreed to sell shares to the government, then Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said they must sign it before they left.

And when the CEOs began to object, Paulson’s consigliere explained that it was ‘in their best interest’ not to protest too much:

With the discussion becoming heated, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, Ben S. Bernanke, who was seated next to Mr. Paulson, interceded. He told the bankers that the session need not be combative, since both the banks and the broader economy stood to benefit from the program. Without such measures, he added, the situation of even healthy banks could deteriorate.

As David Boaz quipped, “Nice little bank ya got there… Shame if anything happened to it.”

The strange thing is, there are still people in America who are surprised to hear that our government behaves like this…

Inflation Fears Ease — So Watch Out!

As I’ve pointed out before, the extreme leverage increases in our economy created a false inflation, and the de-leveraging is an inherently deflationary process.

There are signs that this false inflation is easing, and possibly even heading into a deflationary curve.

Consumer prices were flat in September as retreating costs for gasoline, clothes and new cars helped to offset rising prices for food, medical care and other things.

The new reading on the Consumer Price Index, the government’s most closely watched inflation barometer, came after prices actually dipped by 0.1 percent in August, the Labor Department reported Thursday.

In the inflation report, when energy and food products are stripped out, “core” prices inched up by just 0.1 percent in September, an improvement from a 0.2 percent advance in August.

The latest showing on inflation was better than economists expected. They were forecasting a 0.1 percent increase in overall prices and a 0.2 percent rise minus energy and food.

I’ve been watching locally as gas prices here in Orange County have dropped, from the $4.50/gallon range at the high points down into the $3.35/gallon range this morning. As they tend to lag the price of oil, they could drop even further. The [impending or currently existing] recession is eating into demand for most consumer goods, which puts downward pressure on prices for those as well.

Food is holding steady, but if we can get some pressure in Washington to end our silly corn ethanol program (only possible if Congressional Democrats try to punish their Midwestern Republican opponents), it could reduce prices there as well.

So why do I say watch out?

With the economy in for a period of weakness that could extend well into next year, inflation should also moderate, Bernanke and other Fed officials predict. Tamer inflation would give the Fed more leeway to slice rates again or at least keep them at low levels for some time.

“The rapidly disappearing inflation threat is providing the Federal Reserve full latitude to move to an easing bias on rates to combat the recession as well as the ongoing financial crisis,” said Brian Bethune, economist at Global Insight.

Many economists believe there’s a strong chance the Fed will lower rates at its next regularly scheduled meeting later this month. In an unprecedented assault on the financial crisis, the Fed and other major central banks together reduced rates last week. The Fed’s main rate dropped to 1.50 percent, from 2 percent.

He says this coming off a 2-week bender where the Fed, the Treasury, and our elected officials have pledged to throw liquidity at the problem to “unfreeze” this market. Now, there’s a chance that our super-intelligent always-prudent benevolent masters in Washington may lay down exactly the right amount of liquidity to forestall deflation, get markets moving, and not create inflation of their own… Yeah, that’s about as likely to happen as France adopting a 55-hour work week.

Much more likely is the scenario where our government throws dollar after dollar, rate cut after rate cut, and stimulus package after stimulus package at the problem until they see movement. After all, now that they know inflation fears are “disappearing”, they know that they have “full latitude” to act. Once they begin to see movement, they’ll finally realize that all those free dollars had a lag period and that they’ve overreached. We’ll have “booming growth” on paper as the value of our money erodes.

Sadly, only the few of us who know that these cycles are induced by a loose monetary system— those of us who saw this problem coming 2+ years ago— will accurately diagnose that the apparent growth is a chimera. And as usual, nobody will listen until it’s too late. They’ll blame the guy in office, and get ready to elect their next savior politician to take care of them. “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! All hail the Wizard!”

Pretty Soon You’re Talkin’ Real Money!

$700B here, $900B there, and now another $250B on top!

The government put itself four-square into the country’s banking business Tuesday, resorting to what President Bush conceded was the unwelcome choice of buying into the system to loosen paralyzed channels of credit.

The president said the decision to buy shares in the nation’s leading banks — a kind of federal intervention not seen since the Depression era — was “not intended to take over the free market but to preserve it.”

Translation: We already broke it, now we have to buy it.

Said Paulson: “Government owning a stake in any private U.S. company is objectionable to most Americans — me included. Yet the alternative of leaving businesses and consumers without access to financing is totally unacceptable.”

Nine major banks will participate initially, including all of the country’s largest institutions. The first bank to take advantage of the new program was Bank of New York Mellon which announced Tuesday that it would sell $3 billion in preferred shares to the Treasury.

Some of the nation’s largest banks had to be pressured by to participate by Paulson, who wanted healthy institutions that did not necessarily need capital from the government to go first as a way of removing any stigma that might be associated with banks getting bailouts.

(emphasis added) Don’t you love it? It’s objectionable to Paulson, and to the American public, and even to the banks themselves. But they have to do it anyway.

A person I know who works in the finance industry said it best: I’m not sure what to think any more. There are a lot of comparisons to 1929, except the government at that time didn’t have the capability to throw any liquiditity in the markets.”

Yep, we’re in pretty much unchartered territory here. We’re taking a situation with echoes of 1929 and throwing so much liquidity at it that we’re not sure what’s going to happen. Nobody knows what to think right now, and that’s pretty damn scary. That Paulson and Bush think they can actually manage the situation is even worse. This really could be the end of America’s financial position in the world.

UPDATE: It has been mentioned elsewhere (and alluded to in the article) that this $250B is part of the $700B bailout money. This appears to be true. So now we have a huge run-up in bank stock prices, because investors know there is a ready buyer about to toss $125B immediately into the 9 biggest banks. Great!

Quote of the Day: The “That’s a Damn Good Question” Edition

John Stossel writing for Townhall.com asks a very good question in his article, Try Free Enterprise.

Everybody talked about the “freeze” in the credit markets, but why, I wonder, were the cable news programs that repeated the credit-freeze mantra pausing for commercials from companies trying to lend me money? Ditech and LendingTree still hawk mortgages at under 6 percent. Some credit freeze.

No Repeat Of The 1930s Here!

Yep… Worried of a liquidity crunch similar to that in the early 1930s, there’s been quite a bit of movement in the last week. Starting with last Friday’s $700B Treasury bailout of toxic debt, followed by yesterday’s $900B+ short-term lending backstop, markets still weren’t assuaged.

So what happened? A big drop from the Fed in short-term interest rates, to nearly the lowest levels since 2003. And this isn’t just an American move, this is worldwide:

The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and other central banks from Britain and Switzerland to Canada and China announced rate reductions within seconds of one another. The British government separately announced a plan to pump billions of pounds into the country’s leading banks as part of a plan that would result in considerably greater government influence over the financial sector there.

The Fed said in a statement that, because of weakening economic activity, it had cut the Federal funds target rate by half a percentage point, to 1.5 percent. It also cut its discount rate by the same amount. The vote was unanimous.

So don’t worry. We’re not going to have a depression caused by lack of liquidity. We’ll have all the problems attendant with too much liquidity instead.

Want an example? As I’ve pointed out before, the unwinding of leverage is an inherently deflationary process. Gold, in its retreat from highs during July as that credit crunch started setting in, dropped from a high very near $1000/ounce to about $840 an ounce late last week. With the news of the bailout, the short-term lending program, and the rate cuts, it has since rocketed back up over $900. I have a feeling it’s headed farther up in the very near term.

1 29 30 31 32 33 34